Friday, September 16, 2005

dual dual

I was at work this afternoon, just kind of a lazy day finishing up some projects for the week. Not much exciting was happening, until a delivery guy came with a big box with that infamous crooked E on the side. You know the one. A big box from dell.

He said it was for a staff person who I knew worked next door to me in the 3d lab, so I pointed him in the right direction, but then out of sheer curiosity, I followed him into the room. The staff person wasn't there, but a friend of mine was, so he signed for it. We both looked at it, and decided it was a shame to let whatever it was sit in the box, so we opened the box to find a fairly nondescript computer from Dell. We opened the computer and saw this:



The image quality is bad, but you get the idea. My friend took out the fact sheet from the box and read: "Two dual core 2.8Ghz Intel Xeon processors, 6 gigs of RAM, 1 Terabyte of SATA hard drive storage in a RAID array..."

You get the idea. This computer - one box running one OS - is theoretically capable of over 11 Ghz of 64 bit computing power. I've seen some pretty gnarly render farms and clusters in my day, but 11 Ghz in ONE COMPUTER? I nearly broke down and wept.


comments
dave said:
forgot to mention... they are beta testing it, Dell doesn't even offer dual-core computers yet!
i was yelled at on fri, september 16 @ 8:23 pm
1
Crash24 said:
If a car has two engines capable of spinning their output shafts at 8K RPM, does it mean that the car's engines together are capable of putting out 16K RPM? No. Same goes for multiple CPU cores/clock speeds in a computer. However, you can add up the combined GFlop output of the four CPU cores.
i was yelled at on fri, september 16 @ 11:56 pm
2
dave said:
I knew someone would call me on that; I realize that you can't combine gigahertz like that, but for illustrative purposes it works better than trying to teach someone about gigaflops and stuff. I'll try to get a benchmark readout from the beast and post it to see how it really runs.And you're right about the engines, but for the sake of argument, two 8k RPM engines are better than one Even though the shaft might not spin at 16k RPM, the power will be "theoretically" twice that of the one engine. That's why I said that the computer was capable of of 11 Ghz of computing power, not necessarily that it was running at 11 Ghz... Wow, hope that makes sense, it's pretty late, and I'm feeling pretty good
i was yelled at on sat, september 17 @ 3:32 am
3
That looks like one sexy sexy beast!
i was yelled at on mon, september 19 @ 10:04 am
4
James said:
Sure it's powerful, but could it kill a velociraptor? I rate all my purchases on whether or not it can kill a velociraptor. I know my toshiba lappy can. It's the only thing it's really good for nowadays.
i was yelled at on mon, september 19 @ 2:36 pm
5
dave said:
got to play on the machine just for a minute or two today, long enough to take a screenshot of the system properties [url] apparently each processor supports hyper threading or something, because the OS reads 8 in there!
i was yelled at on thu, september 22 @ 8:18 pm
6
Crash24 said:
What OS is it running? I know XP Pro can only do SMP to two processors, but does it see one dual-core as an SMP system?Of course Linux can do the whole SMP/HT/Dualcore thing no problem
i was yelled at on fri, september 23 @ 10:12 am
7
pobre said:
seriously....thats burly, but there had better be some pretty awesome cooling for the beast....
i was yelled at on fri, september 23 @ 12:34 pm
8

Add A Comment:

name
email
url

remember me